My blogmate has pushed a series of misguided posts about what he perceives as misconceptions regarding the schooling process. Because he is critical of our flawless schooling system, he is obviously wrong 110% of the time. As a fake teacher, I'm obviously the purfect person to disprove his points. I'm also 110% confident that my conclusive nonsense will be so flawless that nobody will make the mistake of believing his more rational arguments.
We have all heard about skilled and unskilled jobs. What's the difference? Obviously, skilled work definitively requires skills while unskilled work requires none. How do we determine whether or not a job requires skill? You don't look at the job itself. You look at the requirements.
Skilled and unskilled work should be defined by their schooling requirements. Fortunately, most people seem to embrace this concept. This means that we can point to the widespread acceptance of our propaganda. This also means that I don't have to establish this fact with any legitimate evidence.
Of course, all of this should be obvious. You can't have skills unless us teachers offer you a piece of paper. The only possible explanation for us not providing you with that piece of paper is that you must have no skills whatsoever. Seriously, how is it even possible to develop skills without us offering the piece of paper? This is clearly impossible and precisely why we are right when we insist that our piece of paper definitively divides skilled labor and unskilled labor.
See my idiut blogmate's previously posted inspiration for this brilliunt post.
No comments:
Post a Comment