In a sense, I get
the idea. Having a disability does not mean that an individual is inferior.
Saying that such people have special needs is more supportive. The problem with
this is that people know that special needs is essentially code for disabled,
putting a negative connotation on having special needs.
Because of how the
term is used, people don't want to think that they have special needs. The
truth, thanks to individuality, is that we all have special needs. Because
people don't want to be identified this way, most people try to avoid
acknowledging that they have special needs, even to themselves.
To avoid the label,
it has become common for people to pursue learning in the manner that pretty
much all teachers embrace. This ultimately requires students to give up on what
makes them special. Students conform to rigid standards as they fear the consequences
of individuality.
I would like to see
teachers bring an end to the words "special needs." If they don't,
there might be a workaround. The only way to salvage the term is to use it more
broadly. To avoid harming individuals, we need to make it clear that everybody
has special needs. Internally, they could discuss the special needs of
disadvantaged individuals. Done properly, this would allow them to openly
acknowledge that a child has special needs without publicly attaching them to
any form of disability.
No comments:
Post a Comment