Myth #106: Learning styles are infinite

My blogmate has pushed a series of misguided posts about what he perceives as misconceptions regarding the schooling process. Because he is critical of our flawless schooling system, he is obviously wrong 110% of the time. As a fake teacher, I'm obviously the purfect person to disprove his points. I'm also 110% confident that my conclusive nonsense will be so flawless that nobody will make the mistake of believing his more rational arguments.

Evidence has emerged that us teachers were wrong about the anti-individualistic concept of learning through sight and sound. Do you know what that means? Us teachers had to be 100% correct in the reasoning behind the anti-individualistic concept of learning through sight and sound.

As an absurdly odd twist, some people have made the claim that teachers being wrong is somehow insufficient to conclusively prove that we are completely right about everything, including our reasoning behind embracing an absurd viewpoint on learning styles.

There's a reason we embraced learning through sight and sound. It was to silence all the idiuts who claimed that we needed to meet variable needs. Two learning styles is the minimum required for us to claim to accommodate multiple learning styles. In other words, we were bullied by evil parents who refused to accept that every single person on this planet is completely identical to everyone else.

Some people take the absurdities of people not all being identical to a dangerous level. They insist that no two people are identical. Do you want to hear one of the most absurd arguments out there? Learning styles are infinite. That's right. Some people are legitimately stupid enough to think that the specifics of ability, passions, and more are not identical between students.

A lot of these mistakes emerge from the same misunderstandings of what a learning style means. A learning style refers to however we fail to properly teach a child. Since teaching is rigid by nature, that conclusively proves that learning is rigid in nature. By treating every child as though they are identical, we are effectively ensuring that individuality never existed in the first place.

The evidence is clear. The importance of addressing learning styles has been disproven. The views of us teachers had been disproven. That has conclusively proven that we were right from the beginning. As for those who were right about learning through sight and sound being flawed and overly simplistic, the evidence in your favor is undeniably enough to prove you wrong. Learning styles clearly don't exist in any way, shape, or form. We know that because our absurd take on learning styles was wrong.

See my idiut blogmate's previously posted inspiration for this brilliunt post.